翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Board of Invention and Research
・ Board of Investment
・ Board of Investment (Mauritius)
・ Board of Jewish Education (Toronto)
・ Board of Longitude
・ Board of Manufactures
・ Board of Marshals
・ Board of Navy Commissioners
・ Board of nursing
・ Board of Ordnance
・ Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
・ Board of Radiation and Isotope Technology
・ Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth
・ Board of Regents of the University of Michigan
・ Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth
・ Board of Registered Polysomnographic Technologists
・ Board of Revenue
・ Board of Revenue, Sindh
・ Board of Secondary Education, Karachi
・ Board of Secondary Education, Madhya Pradesh
・ Board of Secondary Education, Odisha
・ Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan
・ Board of selectmen
・ Board of Selectmen of Somerville, Massachusetts
・ Board of State Viticultural Commissioners
・ Board of Studies
・ Board of Studies "Street Sense" – Road Safety Songs
・ Board of Studies, Teaching and Educational Standards
・ Board of Supervision of Estate Agents (Sweden)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth : ウィキペディア英語版
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth

''Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth'', ,〔() The Oyez Project, Board of Regents Univ. Wisc. v. Southworth, 529 U.S. 217 (2000).〕 is a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that public universities may subsidize campus groups by means of a mandatory student activity fee without violating the students' First Amendment rights.
==Background==
On April 2, 1996, three law students at the University of Wisconsin–Madison sued in federal court challenging the constitutionality of the university's mandatory student fee system, arguing that it was unconstitutional for portions of their student fee to fund political or ideological activities with which they disagreed. The plaintiff students were particularly concerned with multi-cultural groups, environmental groups, and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender groups. The Board of Regents and the university system defended the fee system.
On November 29, 1996 the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in ''Southworth v. Grebe'' granted summary judgment in favor of the three law students. The district court ruled that the fee system violated the students' free-speech rights by compelling them to fund speech they disagreed with.
On August 10, 1998, a three-judge panel of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in ''Southworth v. Grebe'' upheld the district court decision in favor of the three students. The appeals court panel concluded that the university funding of private political speech was not germane to its mission and that even if it were the university did not have a compelling reason to require students to fund speech they opposed.
On October 27, 1998, the full 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for rehearing.
The University of Wisconsin appealed the case to the Supreme Court, arguing that the marketplace of ideas created by student fees is an appropriate and important part of the school's educational mission. On March 29, 1999 the U.S. Supreme Court granted ''certiorari'' because the 7th Circuit's decision conflicted with precedent established in other circuit courts.
On March 22, 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously overturned the 7th Circuit ruling that ruled mandatory student fees unconstitutional. Mandatory student fees currently fund a diverse array of activities ranging from lecture series to health services to the student newspaper.
The Supreme Court's ruling provided a legal framework for a student fee system that engages students on issues ranging all over the political, social, and activist spectrum.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.